:: Okay okay, I agreed with you after the first paragraph.
:: As I see it, this article covers several different issues, none of which necessarily need to be in the same article, unless the U.S. or Israel decide to go to war with Iran (and [[United States-Iran relations]] or [[Iran-Israel relations]] already cover the bits that might lead up to a war).
:: One is the international response to Iran's nuclear program.  This is already somewhat by [[Nuclear program of Iran#Views on Iran's Nuclear Power Programme]], but perhaps we could have a new article named [[International response to Iran's nuclear program]].
:: Another issue is the extent to which Iran is involved in the Iraq war.




: Regardless of what Sinooher's nationality is, I think Sinooher is correct, the title and the premise of the article is POV, and it's almost a POV fork of [[foreign relations of Iran]].  The top of the article explicitly says its goal is to address a variety of issues tackled in more depth in other articles, and come to the conclusion that it's a crisis.  In lieu of reliable sources that back up that conclusion, that's original research.





AFD
-----------------------
Unecessary sensationalism.  It's not obvious yet that conflict is imminent.  

Per [http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=crisis] and [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/crisis], "crisis" implies that Iran faces an impending abrupt change.  However, it's not obvious at this point whether the situations will be resolved abruptly via confrontation, or whether they'll be resolved gradually ([[WP:NOT]] a crystal ball).




OR, NOT a crystal ball, POV.  It's not obvious that conflict is imminent.  It's not obvious that